The Rundown
21st March
Join us for free. You know you want to.
A group of students is visiting Israel and Palestine
Win tickets to Alton Towers and £100 magic money!
Sign up and be envied the world over
Write for us: it'll look great on your CV and it's good fun, too

Members

Username:

Password:

Not a member?
What are you waiting for? Get yourself registered or find out more about the benefits.

Sponsors

My Internet Pass: prepaid internet access

Online Games CompetitionsCompetitions
Win stunning prizes and random junk with our free competitions for UK students.

About usAbout us
Who are we? What on earth is going on here? Nope, we don't know either.

Write for usWrite for us
Fancy a career in the media? Boost your CV and have fun by writing for us.

Contact usContact us
Got a story? Want to send us some cash in a brown envelope? We'd love to hear from you.

Top stories

XML

Lincoln University marking scam claims

Lincoln University is at the centre of a marking scam revealed by a whistleblower who claims lecturers were told to issue marks to students who hadn't even completed any coursework or assessments.

Marking
Well at least he registered - I'll give him 5%

According to a leaked memo, lecturers at the university were informed by their heads of department to award a mark of 5% to students who had failed to hand in or complete the work they had been set. Although many lecturers ignored the instructions, those who failed to award marks to students had the information altered by clerical staff.

Universities stand to lose £4000 for each student who fails to complete their course and these findings appear to suggest that Lincoln University was attempting to cover up their drop out numbers in order to limit their financial losses.

Quoted in The Sunday Times, the informer said: "We were being asked to do something dodgy. These were students that hadn't attended lectures or submitted any work."

Lincoln University denies introducing any such scheme in order to limit the potential financial repercussions, claiming instead that the 5% mark was suggested in order to ensure students were properly discussed at exam board meetings due to a technical error and to ensure students appeared on the system.

Send this article to a friend Send this article to a friend